Just like an individual investor's 401k account or brokerage account, a mutual fund is nothing but an account with deposits and withdrawals. The only difference is that the deposits and withdrawals in a mutual fund are purchases and redemptions made by independent investors who don't know about each other. Now assume that 5 years ago, you invested $10,000 in a certain mutual fund. Today, the mutual fund reports an annual return of 7% for the trailing 5 year period. Then you can demand to be paid $10,000 × (1 + .07)5 = $11,402.55 upon redeeming your shares. When calculating its return, the mutual fund is thus constrained by the requirement that the total value of its investors' shares add up to what the fund actually has in the pot. This return is called the time-weighted return, or TWR for short. It is almost always given as an annualized return, in which case it is more appropriately called the time-weighted rate of return.
The time-weighted rate of return is different from the fixed rate equivalent (FREQ), which is the appropriate measure of performance for an individual investor's account. Speaking very generally, the difference is this: an individual investor wants all the deposits and withdrawals and their timings to be taken into account when judging the performance of his or her account (money-weighted performance). The mutual fund, on the other hand, must figure out how one investor's single investment at the beginning of the reporting period has performed, independently of what other cash flows have occurred since. These white papers have more on the subject:
In this appendix, we prove that when interest compounds at a constant rate, the principal doubles every x number of years, where x is a number that depends only on the interest rate. Moreover, the number x, which is also called the doubling time, is roughly equal to .7/r periods, where r is the period interest rate as a fraction.
Suppose that an amount of money B is invested at a fixed period rate of r. Equation (5) tells us that the value Ex of the principal after x number of periods equals
Since we are looking for the number of periods it takes for the principal to double, we are looking for the value of x that satisfies
Cancelling B out of the equation, we see that x depends only on r:
Taking the natural logarithm on both sides of the equation, we obtain
For a rough estimate, we can use .7 for ln(2). Also, for small values of r, such as rates between 0 and .1 (meaning between 0% and 10%), the value of ln(1 + r) is close to r, and we obtain